It's all about HOW.

Tonight I was scrolling through my Twitter feed when I came across a tweet of an article by nofilmschool.com titled, Here's Why You Should Think Twice Before Buying That Fancy New Camera.”  Curiously, I looked into it and found it spoke so much truth that it also covered a lot of insecurities I had when making videos for myself or for clients.  Here are my thoughts.

Here is the full article I mentioned.  I highly recommend giving the time to read this, especially if you’re a filmmaker: http://bit.ly/1MvSy9A

I've been partially guilty about "Gear Acquisition Syndrome" when it comes to filmmaking over the years.  Less than two weeks ago, I actually upgraded to a newer camera, the Panasonic Lumix G7 when my Canon EOS Rebel T3i started to show its age. I, at least, felt it was time to do so, so I did it.  It is an upgrade from my previous camera and still does the same job with more features, but it does not compare to industry grade cinema cameras big sun kissed studios like Paramount or Universal Studios use for their major blockbusters.

There are many insecurities I have when comparing my work next to other peoples’ work; we all have them (I hope.)  One in particular I was eaten alive about was the notion that “If you want yourself and your work to be considered professional, you have to start shooting on better gear like a full frame camera.  They’re just better.”  Yes, full-frame DSLRs and cameras may have some features that APS-C DSLRs and mirrorless cameras don’t have, like better high dynamic range and better low light capabilities, but just because these other cameras don’t have those features or are not nearly as great doesn’t make them useless or not professional whatsoever.  I dislike how often it was ingrained in my mind that that’s “how it’s supposed to be.”

I have learned that the camera you use with tremendous emphasis on how you use it determines the quality of your productions.  For example, shooting with a cinema camera will basically garner better-looking images than your smartphone will, but even if you are a beginner or a professional, there will be compromises to make based on your budget.  HOW you edit your shots together, how you frame certain scenes and shots with your camera, how you move your camera and how you use the rest of your equipment to evoke certain reactions or emotions will most definitely contribute to your aesthetic style as an auteur.  What I mostly want to stress here is, like what Simon said in his video, your production value mainly weighs on HOW you utilize your equipment.  You are not required to have the latest and greatest technology for your productions.  You are also not required to shoot on big, expensive cameras like full-frame cameras, which is why Simon learned better visual techniques inside and out of his Canon T3i to get such nice images out of his set-up.  There are filmmakers who shoot on cell phones and can still tell a compelling narrative better than some with high-end equipment.  Simon took great advantage of his low-budget equipment like I have been doing myself over the years with my work.  I should not be letting these ideologies hinder my creativity most of the time and just keep continuing to just doing it and experimenting with what I have.  If I’m happy with what I shot/made at the end of the day and can formulate that into a cohesive work, that’s all that should matter.

If there’s anything left to say, by all means, make sure you make the most out of your budget, whether there is one or not. Upgrade your equipment, if and only if, it is failing and properly needs to be replaced, is actually hindering your productive efforts or if it will work well enough to do the job if you don’t have it already.  I would love to shoot on bigger cameras like a RED someday like so many other filmmakers would, but I don’t necessarily need to spend tens of thousands of dollars when I can effectively do the same exact job with my equipment now.  Also, I have these things called student loans that will need to be attended to first, and rent, food, all that jazz.

I need to make sure, above all, that I have the basics of production gear, whether that be a camera, a lens, a microphone and some lights, and a crew capable of collaboration to show and tell a provoking visual story. I should not let my perfectly-working technology and handy crew hinder my creativity because "I don't have a RED Epic" to tell the story all for me.

Thanks for reading.  Do you agree?  Disagree?  Did I miss anything?  You can talk to me @MitchGFilms on Twitter or down in the comments.  Let's have a discussion.

Vertical Video - It's MOSTLY bad.

As a filmmaker, if there is one thing that peeves me the most is when I see vertical video.  A good online friend of mine who is also an up-and-coming filmmaker, Michael Manus, brought up the concern of vertical video and I felt like it would be a good idea to chime in and share my thoughts on his discussion.  Although mostly an inconvenience, I do know ONE way that vertical video can prove to be somewhat beneficial.

As I see it, vertical video is shot destined for leisure, as in people shoot mostly vertically for sending snapchats to their friends and so forth.  What irks me the most is seeing vertical video posted online, however.  Webcams on computers have always been oriented to shoot 4:3 or 16:9 aspect ratio; or landscape video rather than portrait.  It is fine to take photos in landscape or portrait as they have their respectful uses.  What makes vertical video so widespread is the capabilities of iPhone cameras and other smartphone technology to allow that orientation for shooting.  It is so easy to pull out your smartphone and record something.  To make it even easier, the camera app allows you to shoot as is rather than orient it to landscape shooting.  As a rule of thumb, whenever I want to shoot something run-and-gun on my Galaxy S4, I tilt it sideways to shoot.  When I see vertical video online, I do not take it seriously and do not even give the time to watch.

Why not shoot vertical video?

From a filmmaker's perspective, shooting vertical video is a BIG no-no.  When we go to the theaters to watch a film, we plant ourselves in front of a horizontal screen.  Our eyes see things horizontally as they are positioned that way on our faces.  Shooting portrait style is a subjective choice; there is something we mainly want to capture rather than the whole picture.  When we see movies, the director's intent is showing us what they want us to see in the foreground and background.  Every time I see a vertical video I feel limited in what else I could be seeing going on.  Video players online such as YouTube fit the vertical video into a 16:9 widescreen video player so it fits the height dimensions but not the width, leaving you with huge black bars on the sides of the video.  Often a fix to this problem I see content creators do is that they take the video, zoom in on it and blur it as a layer behind the vertical video so the videos fit the 16:9 ratio.  It's overall a nicer aesthetic fix compared to the huge black bars on the sides of the video.

Here's a fun little video that also shares the same points I'm trying to get across.

But wait...

There is only one way I see fit as acceptable to shoot videos vertically.  You wouldn't be shooting with a cell phone typically for this, but with an actual camcorder or DSLR.  If you are in need of doing VFX work (such as green screen compositing work) and need a full body shot of your subject and may or may not be lacking in shoot space, your best bet is to actually shoot your subject vertically.  When you shoot a subject in front of a green screen horizontally, you may lose quality in your image when it comes time to enlarge them in post (if need be).  When you shoot your subject vertically and encompassing them fully in your frame, you'll minimize blank space in your frame and will be utilizing more pixels or detail with your composition.  Your subject is most likely standing vertically in front of a green screen, so why not shoot vertically if you are compositing your subject's image?  The only downside to this is if you need your subject to move around within the frame, then this would not be the best option.  If the subject is static in your frame like I described above, then you should retain more detail, therefore, shoot vertically.

What is your stance on vertical video?  Do you agree or disagree with me?  Voice your opinions down below!

Restarting!

Hello!  It's sure been a while since I've written a post on this blog.  I've been meaning to try to make more of an effort with these blogs and now's the time to take action.  I am required to keep a blog for a course I'm taking at my university called Computer Mediated Communication.  I will be posting once a week.  Perfect timing, right?

What will these upcoming blog posts consist of?  We are required to keep a running blog of a hobby or big interest that we have for the course.  I will be sharing posts about filmmaking related topics and ideas of technology revolving around the process.  I love filmmaking and I believe I could also call myself a technophile in some aspects as well.  Some of my posts may address the types of equipment I use, projects I'm working on, a cool short-film or music video I come across, ideas of technology fused with the digital medium in relation to class discussion or my current whereabouts of my creative endeavors!

I hope you stick around as this blog may finally jumpstart into a conversation I've wanted to establish for a while and get my thoughts out there.  If you've gotten this far with reading, thank you very much!  If there is anything you want me to address in future posts, please let me know by commenting or tweeting me on Twitter: @MitchGFilms!

-Mitch